MVC 3 Unobtrusive Validation with LINQ to SQL

Recently I've been working on a small project that uses LINQ to SQL as it's data layer (it's a very simple model) and contains two presentation projects - a web form application for the front end and an MVC 3 administration panel.

When playing with the unobtrusive validation engine, you'll find many examples on the 'net telling you to decorate your model with various attributes from the System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations namespace. Now, I ran in to a bit of an issue with the LINQ to SQL objects - they're generated dynamically. I could add the attributes, but they would be overwritten any time I made a change to my DBML file. So, after a bit of searching I came across the MetaDataTypeAttribute in the same namespace. This attribute allows you to create a completely separate, standard class and define it as a Meta Data container for another class. Neat, hu?

Well, I quickly ran in to my second issue - I could create my separate class, but I still had to tag the LINQ classes with the attribute... which meant that data would also be overwritten.

LINQ classes are partial classes - it didn't dawn on me for a few hours, but I could effectively create another partial class in the DBML's code behind file (right click on the DBML file -> View Code) and decorate THAT class with the attribute - which would never be overwritten by the code generator. Below is what my LINQ code behind looks like. This example also includes a CustomValidationAttribute example, which took me a little bit to figure out:


   1:  using System;
   2:  using System.Text;
   3:  using System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations;
   4:   
   5:  namespace MyNameSpace {
   6:      [MetadataType(typeof(News_Validation))]
   7:      partial class News {
   8:      }
   9:      [MetadataType(typeof(ExclusionDate_Validation))]
  10:      partial class ExclusionDate {
  11:      }
  12:      public sealed class News_Validation {
  13:          [Required(ErrorMessage = "Post content is required.")]
  14:          public string Content { get; set; }
  15:      }
  16:      public sealed class ExclusionDate_Validation {
  17:          [Required(ErrorMessage = "'Date To Replace' is required."), CustomValidation(typeof(Validator), "ValidateDate")]
  18:          public DateTime DateToReplace { get; set; }
  19:   
  20:          [CustomValidation(typeof(Validator), "ValidateDate")]
  21:          public DateTime ReplacementDate { get; set; }
  22:      }
  23:   
  24:      public static class Validator {
  25:          public static ValidationResult ValidateDate(string inputDate) {
  26:              DateTime thisDate;
  27:              if ((inputDate != null) && inputDate.Trim() != string.Empty) {
  28:                  if (DateTime.TryParse(inputDate, out thisDate)) {
  29:                      return ValidationResult.Success;
  30:                  } else {
  31:                      return new ValidationResult("Not a valid date.");
  32:                  }
  33:              } else {
  34:                  return ValidationResult.Success;
  35:              }
  36:          }
  37:      }
  38:  }

Popular posts from this blog

Handling uploads with MVC4, JQuery, Plupload and CKEditor

I spent a considerable amount of time trying to get MVC to work nicely with various file uploaders while I was writing  RustyShark , and I have to admit it's been pretty frustrating at times. On the plus side, it's taught me a lot about how Microsoft MVC works behind the scenes, and allowed me to play with quite a few different uploading tools that're out there. My upload page on RustyShark has quite a complex model - each review is related to multiple Formats (PS3, 360, DVD, Blu Ray etc), each review / format combination can have multiple images associated with it, and each image has additional meta data attached, such as a caption and an upload date. The upload form is created using a combination of Editor Templates, JQuery and AJAX. I will be stripping down any examples to their bare bones to make things a little clearer. This article assumes you are familiar with MVC fundamentals such as creating controllers, views and models within Visual Studio 2010 or later, you
Read more

Getting Unity 3D working with Git on Windows

Image
Git is a brilliant, yet peculiar beast. It has the most flexibility of any of the VCS's I've used, and it's extremely powerful and quick once you get used to how it works. Suffice to say that I've fallen in love with it over the past year, for both personal and commercial projects, and online services like github and bitbucket just enhance the overall appeal of it. I therefore want to use it as my VCS of choice when developing games... but those who have tried to get Unity and git working together will probably either be dead by their own hand, or crouched in a corner, rocking back and forth in the foetal position. Unity3D is an entirely different, and possibly more peculiar beast. It's a great tool, and the editor is feature rich, but it's source control compatibility is weak to say the least. I don't know if this is through necessity, or the marketing people at Unity have pressed the developers to make it as complicated as possible in order to sell their
Read more

Generating a self-signed SSL certificate for my QNAP NAS

I recently bought a new NAS (Network Attached Storage) to deal with some of my remote work requirements. Initially I was going to build a server to do the job from spare parts, but I was concerned about power consumption and of course the amount of time it would take to build, configure and administrate. In the end, I had a little look at a few reviews and I decided on the QNAP 219P+. I can honestly say without a doubt that it's one of the best pieces of kit I've bought for a while. It's very feature rich, (almost) everything seems to work perfectly, the interface is well organised and easy to use, and maybe the most important part - it's fast . I'm having a few issues getting the WebDAV service accepting connections, though I think it's Windows' fault, not the QNAP. It's a little on the pricey side for home users, but I didn't mind paying what I did considering how good it is. One of the things I wanted to do was secure my remote communication w
Read more