MVC 3 Unobtrusive Validation with LINQ to SQL

Recently I've been working on a small project that uses LINQ to SQL as it's data layer (it's a very simple model) and contains two presentation projects - a web form application for the front end and an MVC 3 administration panel.

When playing with the unobtrusive validation engine, you'll find many examples on the 'net telling you to decorate your model with various attributes from the System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations namespace. Now, I ran in to a bit of an issue with the LINQ to SQL objects - they're generated dynamically. I could add the attributes, but they would be overwritten any time I made a change to my DBML file. So, after a bit of searching I came across the MetaDataTypeAttribute in the same namespace. This attribute allows you to create a completely separate, standard class and define it as a Meta Data container for another class. Neat, hu?

Well, I quickly ran in to my second issue - I could create my separate class, but I still had to tag the LINQ classes with the attribute... which meant that data would also be overwritten.

LINQ classes are partial classes - it didn't dawn on me for a few hours, but I could effectively create another partial class in the DBML's code behind file (right click on the DBML file -> View Code) and decorate THAT class with the attribute - which would never be overwritten by the code generator. Below is what my LINQ code behind looks like. This example also includes a CustomValidationAttribute example, which took me a little bit to figure out:


   1:  using System;
   2:  using System.Text;
   3:  using System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations;
   4:   
   5:  namespace MyNameSpace {
   6:      [MetadataType(typeof(News_Validation))]
   7:      partial class News {
   8:      }
   9:      [MetadataType(typeof(ExclusionDate_Validation))]
  10:      partial class ExclusionDate {
  11:      }
  12:      public sealed class News_Validation {
  13:          [Required(ErrorMessage = "Post content is required.")]
  14:          public string Content { get; set; }
  15:      }
  16:      public sealed class ExclusionDate_Validation {
  17:          [Required(ErrorMessage = "'Date To Replace' is required."), CustomValidation(typeof(Validator), "ValidateDate")]
  18:          public DateTime DateToReplace { get; set; }
  19:   
  20:          [CustomValidation(typeof(Validator), "ValidateDate")]
  21:          public DateTime ReplacementDate { get; set; }
  22:      }
  23:   
  24:      public static class Validator {
  25:          public static ValidationResult ValidateDate(string inputDate) {
  26:              DateTime thisDate;
  27:              if ((inputDate != null) && inputDate.Trim() != string.Empty) {
  28:                  if (DateTime.TryParse(inputDate, out thisDate)) {
  29:                      return ValidationResult.Success;
  30:                  } else {
  31:                      return new ValidationResult("Not a valid date.");
  32:                  }
  33:              } else {
  34:                  return ValidationResult.Success;
  35:              }
  36:          }
  37:      }
  38:  }

Popular posts from this blog

TDD and Unit Testing with Moq

In my last post, I mentioned that I've been using TDD and mocking quite a bit this year, and I've fallen in love. It's something I'm very keen on continuing with, as I've now seen that the benefits outweigh the extra time needed to develop your tests. I've written my fair share of stand alone unit and integration tests throughout the years, but until recently I've not used object mocking or stubbing. I've never really appreciated what tests are, and what benefits they give me as a developer, other than they let me write a quick bit of throw-away code that enables me to test the functionality of a class or a method. Only now - 16 years in to my career - do I realise how critical unit tests are to an application, especially in enterprise level systems that have a lot of code reuse and crossover. Not only do well written tests test the functionality of your code base, they also allow you to modify anything with complete confidence that your changes aren...
Read more

Handling uploads with MVC4, JQuery, Plupload and CKEditor

I spent a considerable amount of time trying to get MVC to work nicely with various file uploaders while I was writing  RustyShark , and I have to admit it's been pretty frustrating at times. On the plus side, it's taught me a lot about how Microsoft MVC works behind the scenes, and allowed me to play with quite a few different uploading tools that're out there. My upload page on RustyShark has quite a complex model - each review is related to multiple Formats (PS3, 360, DVD, Blu Ray etc), each review / format combination can have multiple images associated with it, and each image has additional meta data attached, such as a caption and an upload date. The upload form is created using a combination of Editor Templates, JQuery and AJAX. I will be stripping down any examples to their bare bones to make things a little clearer. This article assumes you are familiar with MVC fundamentals such as creating controllers, views and models within Visual Studio 2010 or later, you ...
Read more

Generating a self-signed SSL certificate for my QNAP NAS

I recently bought a new NAS (Network Attached Storage) to deal with some of my remote work requirements. Initially I was going to build a server to do the job from spare parts, but I was concerned about power consumption and of course the amount of time it would take to build, configure and administrate. In the end, I had a little look at a few reviews and I decided on the QNAP 219P+. I can honestly say without a doubt that it's one of the best pieces of kit I've bought for a while. It's very feature rich, (almost) everything seems to work perfectly, the interface is well organised and easy to use, and maybe the most important part - it's fast . I'm having a few issues getting the WebDAV service accepting connections, though I think it's Windows' fault, not the QNAP. It's a little on the pricey side for home users, but I didn't mind paying what I did considering how good it is. One of the things I wanted to do was secure my remote communication w...
Read more