AutoMapper: UseValue vs ResolveUsing vs MapFrom

I just hit a confusing mapping bug whilst using AutoMapper to map DateTime.Now to a field in my database. Every item that was being added to the database had the same value in the "DateAdded" - to the millisecond. This was because I was using the following mapping expression:

Mapper.CreateMap<SourceObject, DestObject>()
.ForMember(m => m.DateAdded, o => o.UseValue(DateTime.Now));



UseValue() retrieves a value on first-run and stores it in the mapping (hence the static DateTime value that's being stored in the database), whereas ResolveUsing() resolves at run-time - which is obviously why it's called ResolveUsing(). A minor oversight, but confusing nonetheless.




    

  • Use ResolveUsing(s => {}) when you want to resolve a destination field from a derived value. This should be used for any DateTime mappings, and any more complicated mapping functions.
    • 

  • Use MapFrom(s => s.MemberName) when you return an actual source object member.
    • 

  • Use UseValue() if you want to map a static value in the mapping, and you know the value itself won't change.
    • 


































































Popular posts from this blog









TDD and Unit Testing with Moq





















In my last post, I mentioned that I've been using TDD and mocking quite a bit this year, and I've fallen in love. It's something I'm very keen on continuing with, as I've now seen that the benefits outweigh the extra time needed to develop your tests.   I've written my fair share of stand alone unit and integration tests throughout the years, but until recently I've not used object mocking or stubbing. I've never really appreciated what tests are, and what benefits they give me as a developer, other than they let me write a quick bit of throw-away code that enables me to test the functionality of a class or a method. Only now - 16 years in to my career  - do I realise how critical unit tests are to an application, especially in enterprise level systems that have a lot of code reuse and crossover. Not only do well written tests test the functionality of your code base, they also allow you to modify anything with complete confidence that your changes aren...








Read more










Handling uploads with MVC4, JQuery, Plupload and CKEditor





















I spent a considerable amount of time trying to get MVC to work nicely with various file uploaders while I was writing  RustyShark , and I have to admit it's been pretty frustrating at times. On the plus side, it's taught me a lot about how Microsoft MVC works behind the scenes, and allowed me to play with quite a few different uploading tools that're out there.   My upload page on RustyShark has quite a complex model - each review is related to multiple Formats (PS3, 360, DVD, Blu Ray etc), each review / format combination can have multiple images associated with it, and each image has additional meta data attached, such as a caption and an upload date. The upload form is created using a combination of Editor Templates, JQuery and AJAX. I will be stripping down any examples to their bare bones to make things a little clearer.   This article assumes you are familiar with MVC fundamentals such as creating controllers, views and models within Visual Studio 2010 or later, you ...








Read more










Generating a self-signed SSL certificate for my QNAP NAS





















I recently bought a new NAS (Network Attached Storage) to deal with some of my remote work requirements. Initially I was going to build a server to do the job from spare parts, but I was concerned about power consumption and of course the amount of time it would take to build, configure and administrate.   In the end, I had a little look at a few reviews and I decided on the QNAP 219P+. I can honestly say without a doubt that it's one of the best pieces of kit I've bought for a while. It's very feature rich, (almost) everything seems to work perfectly, the interface is well organised and easy to use, and maybe the most important part - it's fast . I'm having a few issues getting the WebDAV service accepting connections, though I think it's Windows' fault, not the QNAP. It's a little on the pricey side for home users, but I didn't mind paying what I did considering how good it is.   One of the things I wanted to do was secure my remote communication w...








Read more